VS
When evaluating costs, HOU features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 1.43% for HOD. Performance-wise, HOU has returned 151.94% year-to-date with -$83 M in net flows, whereas HOD is at 77.27% with +$264 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HOU
HOD
| AuM | $129.38 M | $199.26 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 1.43% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.40% | 1.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HOU | +4.85% | +126.57% | +151.94% | +128.12% | +56.72% |
HOD | -22.27% | -73.86% | -77.27% | -81.14% | -86.79% | |
| Flows | HOU | -$45 M | -$47 M | -$83 M | -$81 M | -$120 M |
HOD | +$95 M | +$242 M | +$264 M | +$255 M | +$223 M |
HOU vs HOD exposure
Countries
HOU
Exposure data will be available soon
HOD
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HOU
Exposure data will be available soon
HOD
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HOU
Exposure data will be available soon
HOD
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HOU
Exposure data will be available soon
HOD
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HOU
HOD
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Horizons Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index - USD | Horizons Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Commodity | Commodity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2008 | January 15, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about HOU and HOD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HOU or HOD?
As of April 24, 2026, HOU has returned 151.94% year to date, while HOD has returned -77.27%. HOU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HOU or HOD?
As of April 24, 2026, HOU manages $129.38 M in assets, while HOD manages $199.26 M. HOD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HOU and HOD managed?
HOU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Horizons Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index - USD benchmark. HOD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Horizons Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HOU or HOD?
Year to date, HOU has seen -$82.89 M in net flows, compared with +$264.45 M for HOD. HOD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HOU and HOD compare?
HOU has an expense ratio of 1.40%, while HOD has an expense ratio of 1.45%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.