VS
Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF (HPF) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HPF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, HPF features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HPF has returned 32.62% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.65% with +$209 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HPF
ZEB
| AuM | $63.54 M | $7,263.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HPF | +7.80% | +7.77% | +32.62% | +43.10% | +49.37% |
ZEB | +1.98% | +16.51% | +32.65% | +67.24% | +148.29% | |
| Flows | HPF | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | +$13 M |
ZEB | +$972 M | +$1,234 M | +$209 M | +$894 M | -$431 M |
HPF vs ZEB exposure
Countries
HPF
USA
47.12%
Canada
26.11%
United Kingdom
9.06%
Other
17.71%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
HPF
Energy
96.38%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HPF
Valero Energy Corp.
6.13%
HF Sinclair Corp.
5.71%
Phillips 66
5.58%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.56%
Enbridge, Inc.
5.48%
TC Energy Corp.
5.46%
EOG Resources, Inc.
5.34%
Ovintiv, Inc.
5.24%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.96%
US30233Q1085
4.90%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%
Diversification
HPF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
54.35%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HPF
ZEB
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.83% | 2.29% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 21, 2014 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HPF and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HPF or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, HPF has returned 32.62% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.65%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HPF or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, HPF manages $63.54 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.26 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HPF and ZEB managed?
HPF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HPF and ZEB emphasize?
HPF is most exposed to Energy. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HPF or ZEB?
Year to date, HPF has seen +$0.53 M in net flows, compared with +$209.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HPF and ZEB compare?
HPF has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HPF and ZEB?
HPF's largest holdings include Valero Energy Corp., HF Sinclair Corp., and Phillips 66. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HPF or ZEB?
HPF holds 20 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HPF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HPF and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.