VS
When evaluating costs, HPYT features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.45% for HBND. Performance-wise, HPYT has returned 3.05% year-to-date with -$133 M in net flows, whereas HBND is at 3.31% with -$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HPYT
HBND
| AuM | $268.11 M | $160.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.69% | 0.65% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HPYT | -0.24% | -3.57% | -3.05% | -3.14% | -0.48% |
HBND | -0.56% | -3.91% | -3.31% | -3.50% | -0.68% | |
| Flows | HPYT | -$21 M | -$52 M | -$133 M | -$176 M | +$464 M |
HBND | +$2 M | +$9 M | -$14 M | -$5 M | +$207 M |
HPYT vs HBND exposure
Countries
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBND
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBND
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBND
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBND
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HPYT
HBND
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 16.00% | 11.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 28, 2023 | September 14, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about HPYT and HBND
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HPYT or HBND?
As of September 22, 2026, HPYT has returned -3.05% year to date, while HBND has returned -3.31%. HPYT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HPYT or HBND?
As of September 22, 2026, HPYT manages $268.11 M in assets, while HBND manages $160.91 M. HPYT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HPYT and HBND managed?
HPYT is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HBND is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HPYT or HBND?
Year to date, HPYT has seen -$132.99 M in net flows, compared with -$13.89 M for HBND. HBND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HPYT and HBND compare?
HPYT has an expense ratio of 0.69%, while HBND has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Recent articles about HPYT and HBND
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.