VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HQU
-----
ZUT
+3.72%+9.48%+20.43%+29.41%+47.71%
Flows
HQU
-----
ZUT
-$15 M+$4 M-$76 M+$122 M+$233 M

HQU vs ZUT exposure

Countries

HQU
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%

Sectors

HQU
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HQU
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%

Diversification

ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%

Characteristics

Compare
HQU
ZUT
Provider-BMO
Management-Passively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset Class-Equity
Dividend Policy-Distributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.77%
Meets ESG criteria-No
Inception Date-January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about HQU and ZUT

Recent articles about HQU and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds