HSH
Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HSH fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HSH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, HSH features a management fee (MER) of 0.11%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HSH has returned 11.22% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 12.81% with -$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HSH
-0.97%+0.49%+11.22%+18.22%+67.82%
ZUT
-6.91%-5.97%+12.81%+18.92%+48.01%
Flows
HSH
+$0 M-$2 M-$25 M-$26 M-$50 M
ZUT
+$25 M-$20 M-$95 M-$88 M+$218 M

HSH vs ZUT exposure

Countries

HSH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%

Sectors

HSH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HSH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%

Diversification

HSH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%

Characteristics

Compare
HSH
ZUT
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 CAD Hedged TR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.93%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 19, 2016January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about HSH and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HSH or ZUT?
As of September 2, 2026, HSH has returned 11.22% year to date, while ZUT has returned 12.81%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HSH or ZUT?
As of September 2, 2026, HSH manages $350.10 M in assets, while ZUT manages $814.36 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HSH and ZUT managed?
HSH is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Hedged TR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HSH and ZUT emphasize?
HSH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HSH or ZUT?
Year to date, HSH has seen -$24.57 M in net flows, compared with -$94.91 M for ZUT. HSH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HSH and ZUT compare?
HSH has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of HSH and ZUT?
HSH's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: HSH or ZUT?
HSH holds 496 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, HSH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HSH and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds