HTA
Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF

Full HTA fund page
VS
QQQY
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF

Full QQQY fund page

Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (QQQY) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HTA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Sovereign, while QQQY leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, HTA features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 2% for QQQY. Performance-wise, HTA has returned 24.43% year-to-date with +$53 M in net flows, whereas QQQY is at 15.99% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HTA
-0.66%+3.93%+24.43%+28.23%+90.12%
QQQY
-0.78%+4.29%+15.99%+22.84%-
Flows
HTA
+$6 M+$23 M+$53 M+$46 M+$141 M
QQQY
-$1 M+$5 M+$16 M+$21 M-

HTA vs QQQY exposure

Countries

HTA
USA
94.15%
QQQY
USA
94.06%

Sectors

HTA
Technology
98.93%
QQQY
Technology
95.07%
As of September 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HTA
Microsoft Corp.
5.91%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.44%
Oracle Corp.
5.37%
Intuit, Inc.
5.29%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
5.16%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.08%
Amphenol Corp.
5.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.97%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.96%
QQQY
Microsoft Corp.
11.32%
Apple, Inc.
10.78%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.15%
Broadcom Inc.
9.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Intel Corp.
2.44%

Diversification

HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
52.83%
QQQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
70.81%

Characteristics

Compare
HTA
QQQY
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.25%11.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 27, 2015October 13, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HTA and QQQY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTA or QQQY?
As of September 10, 2026, HTA has returned 24.43% year to date, while QQQY has returned 15.99%. HTA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTA or QQQY?
As of September 10, 2026, HTA manages $887.85 M in assets, while QQQY manages $129.30 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTA and QQQY managed?
HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HTA and QQQY emphasize?
HTA is most exposed to Technology and Sovereign. QQQY is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTA or QQQY?
Year to date, HTA has seen +$53.29 M in net flows, compared with +$15.73 M for QQQY. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTA and QQQY compare?
HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%.
What are the top holdings of HTA and QQQY?
HTA's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQQY's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HTA or QQQY?
HTA holds 25 securities, while QQQY holds 47. On holdings count, QQQY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HTA and QQQY

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds