VS
Compare Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA) vs Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HTA provides Information Technology and Communication Services exposures, while TLF is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, HTA features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, HTA has returned 2.23% year-to-date with +$27 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 4.42% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HTA
TLF
| AuM | $733.42 M | $134.21 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HTA | +6.51% | +2.08% | +2.23% | +37.18% | +81.06% |
TLF | +7.11% | +2.63% | +4.42% | +41.90% | +93.31% | |
| Flows | HTA | +$11 M | +$26 M | +$27 M | +$49 M | +$136 M |
TLF | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$0 M | +$13 M |
HTA vs TLF exposure
Countries
HTA
USA
87.90%
Ireland
9.40%
TLF
USA
91.10%
Other
8.90%
Sectors
HTA
Information Technology
87.40%
Communication Services
9.90%
TLF
Information Technology
75.40%
Communication Services
10.60%
Other
10.20%
As of April 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HTA
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.00%
MICROSOFT-T
5.00%
NVIDIA
5.00%
APPLE
5.00%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
5.00%
ORACLE SYS
5.00%
SERVICENOW
5.00%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.00%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
5.00%
INTUIT
4.90%
TLF
APPLE
6.70%
NVIDIA
6.70%
ALPHABET INC-CL
6.60%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
6.60%
CORNING
5.60%
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.50%
AMPHENOL
5.00%
APPLIED MATERIAL
4.40%
USN070592100
4.20%
CISCO-T
4.10%
Diversification
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
49.90%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
55.40%
Characteristics
Compare
HTA
TLF
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.16% | 6.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 27, 2015 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HTA and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTA or TLF?
As of April 15, 2026, HTA has returned 2.23% year to date, while TLF has returned 4.42%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTA or TLF?
As of April 15, 2026, HTA manages $733.42 M in assets, while TLF manages $134.21 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTA and TLF managed?
HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HTA and TLF emphasize?
HTA is most exposed to Information Technology and Communication Services. TLF is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTA or TLF?
Year to date, HTA has seen +$27.01 M in net flows, compared with +$1.28 M for TLF. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTA and TLF compare?
HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of HTA and TLF?
HTA's largest holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, MICROSOFT-T, and NVIDIA. TLF's top holdings include APPLE, NVIDIA, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: HTA or TLF?
HTA holds 20 securities, while TLF holds 24. On holdings count, TLF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HTA and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.