VS
Compare Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) vs Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HTA provides Technology and Sovereign exposures, while TLF is primarily weighted in Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HTA features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, HTA has returned 24.43% year-to-date with +$53 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 23.93% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HTA
TLF
| AuM | $887.85 M | $157.74 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HTA | -0.66% | +3.93% | +24.43% | +28.23% | +90.12% |
TLF | -1.83% | +1.02% | +23.93% | +32.80% | +93.39% | |
| Flows | HTA | +$6 M | +$23 M | +$53 M | +$46 M | +$141 M |
TLF | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
HTA vs TLF exposure
Countries
HTA
USA
94.15%
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
Sectors
HTA
Technology
98.93%
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HTA
Microsoft Corp.
5.91%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.44%
Oracle Corp.
5.37%
Intuit, Inc.
5.29%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
5.16%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.08%
Amphenol Corp.
5.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.97%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.96%
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
Diversification
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
52.83%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
Characteristics
Compare
HTA
TLF
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.25% | 5.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 27, 2015 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HTA and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTA or TLF?
As of September 10, 2026, HTA has returned 24.43% year to date, while TLF has returned 23.93%. HTA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTA or TLF?
As of September 10, 2026, HTA manages $887.85 M in assets, while TLF manages $157.74 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTA and TLF managed?
HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HTA and TLF emphasize?
HTA is most exposed to Technology and Sovereign. TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTA or TLF?
Year to date, HTA has seen +$53.29 M in net flows, compared with +$3.85 M for TLF. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTA and TLF compare?
HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of HTA and TLF?
HTA's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. TLF's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HTA or TLF?
HTA holds 25 securities, while TLF holds 26. On holdings count, TLF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HTA and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.