VS
Compare Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) vs Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HTA provides Information Technology and Communication Services exposures, while TLF is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, HTA features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, HTA has returned 20.62% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 27.17% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HTA
TLF
| AuM | $858.46 M | $162.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HTA | +6.89% | +27.02% | +20.62% | +34.12% | +90.33% |
TLF | +5.35% | +29.32% | +27.17% | +46.25% | +109.03% | |
| Flows | HTA | +$2 M | +$18 M | +$32 M | +$30 M | +$134 M |
TLF | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$0 M | +$10 M |
HTA vs TLF exposure
Countries
HTA
USA
91.20%
Ireland
9.20%
TLF
USA
91.10%
Other
8.90%
Sectors
HTA
Information Technology
91.00%
Communication Services
9.40%
TLF
Information Technology
75.60%
Communication Services
10.40%
Other
9.90%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HTA
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
6.10%
APPLE
5.60%
CISCO-T
5.50%
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.30%
NVIDIA
5.20%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
5.20%
ORACLE SYS
5.10%
SERVICENOW
5.10%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.10%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
5.10%
TLF
NVIDIA
7.20%
APPLE
7.00%
ALPHABET INC-CL
6.60%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
5.90%
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.80%
CORNING
5.50%
AMPHENOL
4.70%
CISCO-T
4.40%
APPLIED MATERIAL
4.40%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.10%
Diversification
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.30%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 23 total
55.60%
Characteristics
Compare
HTA
TLF
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.06% | 5.29% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 27, 2015 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HTA and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTA or TLF?
As of June 11, 2026, HTA has returned 20.62% year to date, while TLF has returned 27.17%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTA or TLF?
As of June 11, 2026, HTA manages $858.46 M in assets, while TLF manages $162.33 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTA and TLF managed?
HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HTA and TLF emphasize?
HTA is most exposed to Information Technology and Communication Services. TLF is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTA or TLF?
Year to date, HTA has seen +$32.40 M in net flows, compared with +$1.79 M for TLF. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTA and TLF compare?
HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of HTA and TLF?
HTA's largest holdings include MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, APPLE, and CISCO-T. TLF's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: HTA or TLF?
HTA holds 20 securities, while TLF holds 23. On holdings count, TLF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HTA and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.