VS
When evaluating costs, HTB features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, HTB has returned 0.55% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.48% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HTB
XIC
| AuM | $171.30 M | $31,788.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 31, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HTB | -2.44% | +1.79% | +0.55% | +2.83% | +14.73% |
XIC | +0.89% | +4.49% | +12.48% | +32.16% | +85.36% | |
| Flows | HTB | +$12 M | -$1 M | +$10 M | +$7 M | -$21 M |
XIC | +$1,003 M | +$1,877 M | +$7,015 M | +$8,315 M | +$13,130 M |
HTB vs XIC exposure
Countries
HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of July 31, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
HTB
XIC
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Total Return Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Indirect | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 7, 2015 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about HTB and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTB or XIC?
As of July 31, 2026, HTB has returned 0.55% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.48%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTB or XIC?
As of July 31, 2026, HTB manages $171.30 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.79 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTB and XIC managed?
HTB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTB or XIC?
Year to date, HTB has seen +$9.75 M in net flows, compared with +$7,015.39 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTB and XIC compare?
HTB has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about HTB and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.