HTB
Global X US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HTB fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, HTB features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HTB has returned 0.55% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 21.42% with -$120 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 31, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HTB
-2.44%+1.79%+0.55%+2.83%+14.73%
ZUT
+0.97%+5.29%+21.42%+25.86%+53.82%
Flows
HTB
+$12 M-$1 M+$10 M+$7 M-$21 M
ZUT
+$17 M-$61 M-$120 M-$40 M+$193 M

HTB vs ZUT exposure

Countries

HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%

Sectors

HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of July 31, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%

Diversification

HTB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%

Characteristics

Compare
HTB
ZUT
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.73%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 7, 2015January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about HTB and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HTB or ZUT?
As of July 31, 2026, HTB has returned 0.55% year to date, while ZUT has returned 21.42%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HTB or ZUT?
As of July 31, 2026, HTB manages $171.30 M in assets, while ZUT manages $852.96 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HTB and ZUT managed?
HTB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HTB or ZUT?
Year to date, HTB has seen +$9.75 M in net flows, compared with -$119.61 M for ZUT. HTB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HTB and ZUT compare?
HTB has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about HTB and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds