VS
Compare Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) vs Scotia US Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HULC and SITU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.05% for SITU. Performance-wise, HULC has returned 13.57% year-to-date with +$249 M in net flows, whereas SITU is at 13.49% with +$891 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HULC
SITU
| AuM | $865.97 M | $4,866.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.09% | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HULC | -2.88% | +1.91% | +13.57% | +11.82% | +91.26% |
SITU | -2.71% | +1.73% | +13.49% | +11.61% | +90.80% | |
| Flows | HULC | +$34 M | +$90 M | +$249 M | +$289 M | +$156 M |
SITU | +$263 M | +$336 M | +$891 M | +$1,236 M | +$2,991 M |
HULC vs SITU exposure
Countries
HULC
USA
96.40%
SITU
USA
97.35%
Sectors
HULC
Technology
47.52%
Finance
12.37%
Healthcare
9.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.42%
Industrials
7.34%
Other
15.02%
SITU
Technology
47.58%
Finance
12.41%
Healthcare
9.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.53%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
14.96%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.03%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
SITU
NVIDIA Corp.
8.05%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
Diversification
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 494 total
38.54%
SITU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.55%
Characteristics
Compare
HULC
SITU
| Provider | Global X | Scotia Bank |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 6, 2020 | March 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HULC and SITU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HULC or SITU?
As of October 30, 2026, HULC has returned 13.57% year to date, while SITU has returned 13.49%. HULC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HULC or SITU?
As of October 30, 2026, HULC manages $865.97 M in assets, while SITU manages $4.87 B. SITU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HULC and SITU managed?
HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark. SITU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HULC and SITU emphasize?
HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. SITU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HULC or SITU?
Year to date, HULC has seen +$248.70 M in net flows, compared with +$891.49 M for SITU. SITU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HULC and SITU compare?
HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while SITU has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of HULC and SITU?
HULC's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. SITU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HULC or SITU?
HULC holds 491 securities, while SITU holds 498. On holdings count, SITU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HULC and SITU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.