VS
Compare Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) vs TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HULC and TPU.U provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.06% for TPU.U. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HULC
TPU.U
| AuM | $865.97 M | $0.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.09% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HULC | -2.88% | +1.91% | +13.57% | +11.82% | +91.26% |
TPU.U | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | HULC | +$34 M | +$90 M | +$249 M | +$289 M | +$156 M |
TPU.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
HULC vs TPU.U exposure
Countries
HULC
USA
96.40%
TPU.U
USA
97.36%
Sectors
HULC
Technology
47.52%
Finance
12.37%
Healthcare
9.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.42%
Industrials
7.34%
Other
15.02%
TPU.U
Technology
47.50%
Finance
12.29%
Healthcare
9.32%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.42%
Industrials
7.40%
Other
15.09%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.03%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
TPU.U
NVIDIA Corp.
8.01%
Apple, Inc.
7.19%
Microsoft Corp.
5.67%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
Diversification
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 494 total
38.54%
TPU.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.47%
Characteristics
Compare
HULC
TPU.U
| Provider | Global X | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 6, 2020 | February 24, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about HULC and TPU.U
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HULC or TPU.U?
Year to date, HULC has seen +$248.70 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for TPU.U. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HULC and TPU.U compare?
HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while TPU.U has an expense ratio of 0.07%.
What are the top holdings of HULC and TPU.U?
HULC's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. TPU.U's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HULC or TPU.U?
HULC holds 491 securities, while TPU.U holds 498. On holdings count, TPU.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HULC or TPU.U?
As of October 30, 2026, HULC manages $865.97 M in assets, while TPU.U manages $0.00 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HULC and TPU.U managed?
HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark. TPU.U is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HULC and TPU.U emphasize?
HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. TPU.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.