VS
Compare Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) vs Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VSP) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HULC and VSP provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.08% for VSP. Performance-wise, HULC has returned 13.57% year-to-date with +$249 M in net flows, whereas VSP is at 9.61% with +$629 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HULC
VSP
| AuM | $865.97 M | $6,349.34 M |
| Management Fees | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -2.38% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HULC | -2.88% | +1.91% | +13.57% | +11.82% | +91.26% |
VSP | -1.00% | +1.64% | +9.61% | +9.83% | +79.90% | |
| Flows | HULC | +$34 M | +$90 M | +$249 M | +$289 M | +$156 M |
VSP | +$96 M | +$162 M | +$629 M | +$694 M | +$1,863 M |
HULC vs VSP exposure
Countries
HULC
USA
96.40%
VSP
USA
97.38%
Sectors
HULC
Technology
47.52%
Finance
12.37%
Healthcare
9.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.42%
Industrials
7.34%
Other
15.02%
VSP
Technology
47.61%
Finance
12.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.59%
Industrials
7.28%
Other
14.83%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.03%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
VSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.37%
Apple, Inc.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
5.77%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
Diversification
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 494 total
38.54%
VSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
39.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HULC
VSP
| Provider | Global X | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 6, 2020 | November 2, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about HULC and VSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HULC or VSP?
As of October 30, 2026, HULC has returned 13.57% year to date, while VSP has returned 9.61%. HULC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HULC or VSP?
As of October 30, 2026, HULC manages $865.97 M in assets, while VSP manages $6.35 B. VSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HULC and VSP managed?
HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark. VSP is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HULC and VSP emphasize?
HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HULC or VSP?
Year to date, HULC has seen +$248.70 M in net flows, compared with +$629.05 M for VSP. VSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HULC and VSP compare?
HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of HULC and VSP?
HULC's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. VSP's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HULC or VSP?
HULC holds 491 securities, while VSP holds 500. On holdings count, VSP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HULC and VSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.