HUN
Global X Natural Gas ETF

Full HUN fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, HUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.99%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, HUN has returned 19.66% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 13.62% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HUN
-3.28%-14.27%-19.66%-17.99%-44.35%
XIC
-3.00%+0.83%+13.62%+23.78%+87.68%
Flows
HUN
+$3 M+$4 M+$5 M+$4 M+$2 M
XIC
+$1,343 M+$2,928 M+$8,616 M+$9,115 M+$14,782 M

HUN vs XIC exposure

Countries

HUN
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.46%

Sectors

HUN
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.19%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HUN
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%

Diversification

HUN
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%

Characteristics

Compare
HUN
XIC
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Natural Gas Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USDS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassCommodityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%1.98%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 24, 2009February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about HUN and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUN or XIC?
As of September 16, 2026, HUN has returned -19.66% year to date, while XIC has returned 13.62%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUN or XIC?
As of September 16, 2026, HUN manages $10.91 M in assets, while XIC manages $33.66 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUN and XIC managed?
HUN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Natural Gas Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUN or XIC?
Year to date, HUN has seen +$4.98 M in net flows, compared with +$8,615.64 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUN and XIC compare?
HUN has an expense ratio of 1.12%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about HUN and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds