VS
When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.6% for UTES. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 8.28% year-to-date with +$145 M in net flows, whereas UTES is at 2.47% with +$223 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUTL
UTES
| AuM | $553.07 M | $423.81 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.84% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUTL | +3.72% | -3.50% | +8.28% | +7.80% | +53.53% |
UTES | +3.93% | -9.92% | +2.47% | +0.83% | - | |
| Flows | HUTL | +$12 M | +$22 M | +$145 M | +$174 M | +$355 M |
UTES | -$2 M | +$74 M | +$223 M | +$288 M | - |
HUTL vs UTES exposure
Countries
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HUTL
UTES
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.21% | 18.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2019 | September 3, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about HUTL and UTES
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or UTES?
As of October 28, 2026, HUTL has returned 8.28% year to date, while UTES has returned 2.47%. HUTL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or UTES?
As of October 28, 2026, HUTL manages $553.07 M in assets, while UTES manages $423.81 M. HUTL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and UTES managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or UTES?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$144.75 M in net flows, compared with +$222.85 M for UTES. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and UTES compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%.
Recent articles about HUTL and UTES
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.