HUTL
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF

Full HUTL fund page
VS
UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HUTL focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy, while UTES leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.6% for UTES. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 8.35% year-to-date with +$68 M in net flows, whereas UTES is at 7.37% with +$82 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Mar 23Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 21, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HUTL
-0.36%+7.29%+8.35%+18.94%+36.82%
UTES
-2.73%+5.71%+7.37%+16.72%-
Flows
HUTL
+$13 M+$62 M+$68 M+$181 M+$296 M
UTES
+$35 M+$62 M+$82 M+$250 M-

HUTL vs UTES exposure

Countries

HUTL
USA
30.30%
Canada
20.80%
United Kingdom
15.60%
Other
33.30%
UTES
Canada
100.17%

Sectors

HUTL
Utilities
42.60%
Communication Services
38.40%
Energy
17.70%
UTES
Utilities
40.77%
Energy
31.24%
Communication Services
28.15%
As of April 21, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HUTL
ENBRIDGE
3.60%
ONEOK
3.60%
FORTUM
3.50%
FIRSTENERGY
3.50%
AT&T
3.50%
VERBUND
3.50%
EMERA
3.50%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.50%
KINDER MORGAN
3.50%
UTES
ALTAGAS
10.83%
ENBRIDGE
10.56%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.35%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.33%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
10.07%
EMERA
10.02%
HYDRO ONE
9.97%
FORTIS
9.95%
BCE
9.31%
TELUS
8.78%

Diversification

HUTL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
35.20%
UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.17%

Characteristics

Compare
HUTL
UTES
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield7.62%14.84%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 15, 2019September 3, 2024

Frequently asked questions about HUTL and UTES

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or UTES?
As of April 21, 2026, HUTL has returned 8.35% year to date, while UTES has returned 7.37%. HUTL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or UTES?
As of April 21, 2026, HUTL manages $499.02 M in assets, while UTES manages $342.23 M. HUTL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and UTES managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HUTL and UTES emphasize?
HUTL is most exposed to Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy. UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or UTES?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$68.22 M in net flows, compared with +$81.82 M for UTES. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and UTES compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%.
What are the top holdings of HUTL and UTES?
HUTL's largest holdings include ENBRIDGE, ONEOK, and FORTUM. UTES's top holdings include ALTAGAS, ENBRIDGE, and PEMBINA PIPELINE.
Which ETF is more diversified: HUTL or UTES?
HUTL holds 30 securities, while UTES holds 10. On holdings count, HUTL is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HUTL and UTES

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds