HUTL
Harvest Utilities Leaders Income ETF

Full HUTL fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Harvest Utilities Leaders Income ETF (HUTL) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HUTL focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Telecommunications, and Energy, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 9.85% year-to-date with +$125 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.77% with +$48 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 31, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HUTL
+1.37%-0.72%+9.85%+13.25%+47.20%
ZEB
+1.95%+15.98%+32.77%+68.32%+146.77%
Flows
HUTL
+$14 M+$50 M+$125 M+$191 M+$343 M
ZEB
+$364 M+$1,061 M+$48 M+$292 M-$759 M

HUTL vs ZEB exposure

Countries

HUTL
USA
38.40%
Canada
20.14%
United Kingdom
15.56%
Other
25.90%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HUTL
Utilities
42.21%
Telecommunications
36.41%
Energy
16.72%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 31, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HUTL
Pinnacle West Capital Corp.
3.76%
Eversource Energy
3.75%
Exelon Corp.
3.71%
Edison International
3.68%
FirstEnergy Corp.
3.67%
Emera, Inc.
3.62%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.60%
Comcast Corp.
3.53%
Veolia Environnement SA
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.41%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

HUTL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 31 total
36.25%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HUTL
ZEB
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield7.90%2.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 15, 2019October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about HUTL and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or ZEB?
As of July 31, 2026, HUTL has returned 9.85% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.77%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or ZEB?
As of July 31, 2026, HUTL manages $548.36 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.10 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and ZEB managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HUTL and ZEB emphasize?
HUTL is most exposed to Utilities, Telecommunications, and Energy. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or ZEB?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$124.86 M in net flows, compared with +$48.05 M for ZEB. HUTL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and ZEB compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HUTL and ZEB?
HUTL's largest holdings include Pinnacle West Capital Corp., Eversource Energy, and Exelon Corp.. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HUTL or ZEB?
HUTL holds 31 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HUTL is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HUTL and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds