VS
Compare Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL) vs BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HUTL provides Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy exposures, while ZWU is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for ZWU. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 8.35% year-to-date with +$68 M in net flows, whereas ZWU is at 9.1% with +$34 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUTL
ZWU
| AuM | $499.02 M | $2,131.75 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUTL | -0.36% | +7.29% | +8.35% | +18.94% | +36.82% |
ZWU | -1.25% | +7.18% | +9.10% | +16.05% | +28.68% | |
| Flows | HUTL | +$13 M | +$62 M | +$68 M | +$181 M | +$296 M |
ZWU | +$43 M | +$19 M | +$34 M | +$216 M | +$160 M |
HUTL vs ZWU exposure
Countries
HUTL
USA
30.30%
Canada
20.80%
United Kingdom
15.60%
Other
33.30%
ZWU
Canada
54.22%
USA
43.05%
Sectors
HUTL
Utilities
42.60%
Communication Services
38.40%
Energy
17.70%
ZWU
Utilities
56.11%
Energy
23.14%
Communication Services
21.65%
As of April 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUTL
ENBRIDGE
3.60%
ONEOK
3.60%
FORTUM
3.50%
FIRSTENERGY
3.50%
AT&T
3.50%
VERBUND
3.50%
EMERA
3.50%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.50%
KINDER MORGAN
3.50%
ZWU
FORTIS
5.56%
HYDRO ONE
5.52%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
5.41%
TC ENERGY CORP
5.38%
AT&T
4.86%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
4.85%
ENBRIDGE
4.80%
EMERA
4.52%
KINDER MORGAN
4.36%
NEXTERA ENERGY
4.35%
Diversification
HUTL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
35.20%
ZWU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
49.61%
Characteristics
Compare
HUTL
ZWU
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.62% | 7.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2019 | October 27, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HUTL and ZWU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or ZWU?
As of April 21, 2026, HUTL has returned 8.35% year to date, while ZWU has returned 9.10%. ZWU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or ZWU?
As of April 21, 2026, HUTL manages $499.02 M in assets, while ZWU manages $2.13 B. ZWU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and ZWU managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZWU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HUTL and ZWU emphasize?
HUTL is most exposed to Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy. ZWU is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or ZWU?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$68.22 M in net flows, compared with +$34.36 M for ZWU. HUTL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and ZWU compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ZWU has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of HUTL and ZWU?
HUTL's largest holdings include ENBRIDGE, ONEOK, and FORTUM. ZWU's top holdings include FORTIS, HYDRO ONE, and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HUTL or ZWU?
HUTL holds 30 securities, while ZWU holds 29. On holdings count, HUTL is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HUTL and ZWU
Unleashing the Potential of Covered Call ETFs
Here's all you need to know about covered call ETFs as a Canadian investor.
Posted on 6/7/2023 by Tony Dong inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.