VS
When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for ZWU. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 9.31% year-to-date with +$145 M in net flows, whereas ZWU is at 6.77% with +$219 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUTL
ZWU
| AuM | $558.34 M | $2,177.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUTL | +4.91% | -2.15% | +9.31% | +9.72% | +54.99% |
ZWU | +4.16% | -4.58% | +6.77% | +5.87% | +45.65% | |
| Flows | HUTL | +$5 M | +$21 M | +$145 M | +$174 M | +$355 M |
ZWU | +$18 M | +$97 M | +$219 M | +$301 M | +$330 M |
HUTL vs ZWU exposure
Countries
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWU
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWU
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWU
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HUTL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWU
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HUTL
ZWU
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.14% | 8.18% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2019 | October 27, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HUTL and ZWU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or ZWU?
As of October 29, 2026, HUTL has returned 9.31% year to date, while ZWU has returned 6.77%. HUTL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or ZWU?
As of October 29, 2026, HUTL manages $558.34 M in assets, while ZWU manages $2.18 B. ZWU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and ZWU managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZWU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or ZWU?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$144.75 M in net flows, compared with +$218.85 M for ZWU. ZWU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and ZWU compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ZWU has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
Recent articles about HUTL and ZWU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.