HUTL
Harvest Utilities Leaders Income ETF

Full HUTL fund page
VS
ZWU
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF

Full ZWU fund page

Compare Harvest Utilities Leaders Income ETF (HUTL) vs BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HUTL provides Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy exposures, while ZWU is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, HUTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for ZWU. Performance-wise, HUTL has returned 12.01% year-to-date with +$97 M in net flows, whereas ZWU is at 11.9% with +$84 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HUTL
+1.87%+0.92%+12.01%+18.00%+48.64%
ZWU
+1.43%+1.09%+11.90%+17.00%+37.99%
Flows
HUTL
+$16 M+$48 M+$97 M+$186 M+$323 M
ZWU
+$20 M+$90 M+$84 M+$201 M+$184 M

HUTL vs ZWU exposure

Countries

HUTL
USA
30.30%
Canada
20.80%
United Kingdom
15.60%
Other
33.30%
ZWU
Canada
55.91%
USA
39.82%

Sectors

HUTL
Utilities
42.60%
Communication Services
38.40%
Energy
17.70%
ZWU
Utilities
54.84%
Energy
23.24%
Communication Services
21.40%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HUTL
ENBRIDGE
3.60%
ONEOK
3.60%
VERBUND
3.50%
EMERA
3.50%
KINDER MORGAN
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.50%
FORTUM
3.50%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
3.50%
FIRSTENERGY
3.50%
AT&T
3.50%
ZWU
HYDRO ONE
5.55%
FORTIS
5.48%
TC ENERGY CORP
5.20%
ENBRIDGE
4.99%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
4.70%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
4.62%
AT&T
4.60%
WILLIAMS
4.58%
EMERA
4.49%
NEXTERA ENERGY
4.10%

Diversification

HUTL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
35.20%
ZWU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
48.31%

Characteristics

Compare
HUTL
ZWU
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield7.56%6.99%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 15, 2019October 27, 2011

Frequently asked questions about HUTL and ZWU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUTL or ZWU?
As of June 12, 2026, HUTL has returned 12.01% year to date, while ZWU has returned 11.90%. HUTL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUTL or ZWU?
As of June 12, 2026, HUTL manages $537.95 M in assets, while ZWU manages $2.21 B. ZWU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUTL and ZWU managed?
HUTL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZWU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HUTL and ZWU emphasize?
HUTL is most exposed to Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy. ZWU is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUTL or ZWU?
Year to date, HUTL has seen +$96.76 M in net flows, compared with +$84.15 M for ZWU. HUTL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUTL and ZWU compare?
HUTL has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ZWU has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of HUTL and ZWU?
HUTL's largest holdings include ENBRIDGE, ONEOK, and VERBUND. ZWU's top holdings include HYDRO ONE, FORTIS, and TC ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: HUTL or ZWU?
HUTL holds 30 securities, while ZWU holds 30. On holdings count, HUTL is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HUTL and ZWU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds