When evaluating costs, HUZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.89%, compared to 0.4% for SBT. Performance-wise, HUZ has returned 32.12% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas SBT is at 34.05% with +$17 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUZ
SBT
| AuM | $39.46 M | $46.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.89% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUZ | -18.76% | -18.30% | -32.12% | -1.55% | +88.02% |
SBT | -20.92% | -17.36% | -34.05% | -3.23% | +98.43% | |
| Flows | HUZ | -$1 M | -$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$2 M |
SBT | -$1 M | -$2 M | +$17 M | +$27 M | +$45 M |
HUZ vs SBT exposure
Countries
HUZ
Exposure data will be available soon
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HUZ
Exposure data will be available soon
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUZ
Exposure data will be available soon
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HUZ
Exposure data will be available soon
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HUZ
SBT
| Provider | Global X | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Commodity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 24, 2009 | July 28, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HUZ and SBT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUZ or SBT?
As of November 3, 2026, HUZ has returned -32.12% year to date, while SBT has returned -34.05%. HUZ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUZ or SBT?
As of November 3, 2026, HUZ manages $39.46 M in assets, while SBT manages $46.70 M. SBT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUZ and SBT managed?
HUZ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD benchmark. SBT is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUZ or SBT?
Year to date, HUZ has seen +$0.93 M in net flows, compared with +$17.48 M for SBT. SBT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUZ and SBT compare?
HUZ has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while SBT has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
Recent articles about HUZ and SBT
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by Edouard Caillieux inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.