VS
When evaluating costs, HVOI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for HLIF. Performance-wise, HVOI has returned 11.75% year-to-date with -$16 M in net flows, whereas HLIF is at 21.54% with +$77 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HVOI
HLIF
| AuM | $39.54 M | $233.45 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HVOI | +3.58% | -0.60% | +11.75% | +16.56% | - |
HLIF | +3.24% | -0.05% | +21.54% | +27.75% | +97.02% | |
| Flows | HVOI | -$2 M | -$16 M | -$16 M | -$12 M | - |
HLIF | +$22 M | +$47 M | +$77 M | +$80 M | +$83 M |
HVOI vs HLIF exposure
Countries
HVOI
Exposure data will be available soon
HLIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HVOI
Exposure data will be available soon
HLIF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HVOI
Exposure data will be available soon
HLIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HVOI
Exposure data will be available soon
HLIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HVOI
HLIF
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.74% | 6.28% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 15, 2025 | June 13, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about HVOI and HLIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HVOI or HLIF?
As of October 28, 2026, HVOI has returned 11.75% year to date, while HLIF has returned 21.54%. HLIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HVOI or HLIF?
As of October 28, 2026, HVOI manages $39.54 M in assets, while HLIF manages $233.45 M. HLIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HVOI and HLIF managed?
HVOI is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HLIF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HVOI or HLIF?
Year to date, HVOI has seen -$15.85 M in net flows, compared with +$76.90 M for HLIF. HLIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HVOI and HLIF compare?
HVOI has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while HLIF has an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Recent articles about HVOI and HLIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.