VS
When evaluating costs, HXS features a management fee (MER) of 0.11%, compared to 0.35% for FCUV. Performance-wise, HXS has returned 15.97% year-to-date with +$521 M in net flows, whereas FCUV is at 17.8% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HXS
FCUV
| AuM | $7,104.76 M | $4,632.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.11% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.11% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.47% | -0.83% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HXS | -0.36% | +3.76% | +15.97% | +13.39% | +94.39% |
FCUV | +1.99% | -0.62% | +17.80% | +23.00% | +110.71% | |
| Flows | HXS | +$23 M | -$595 M | +$521 M | +$949 M | +$2,506 M |
FCUV | +$256 M | +$666 M | +$1,972 M | +$2,260 M | +$3,525 M |
HXS vs FCUV exposure
Countries
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HXS
FCUV
| Provider | Global X | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Indirect | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 30, 2010 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HXS and FCUV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXS or FCUV?
As of October 27, 2026, HXS has returned 15.97% year to date, while FCUV has returned 17.80%. FCUV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXS or FCUV?
As of October 27, 2026, HXS manages $7.10 B in assets, while FCUV manages $4.63 B. HXS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXS and FCUV managed?
HXS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXS or FCUV?
Year to date, HXS has seen +$521.30 M in net flows, compared with +$1,972.49 M for FCUV. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXS and FCUV compare?
HXS has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Recent articles about HXS and FCUV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.