HXS
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HXS fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HXS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services, while HBNK leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HXS features a management fee (MER) of 0.11%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HXS has returned 7.94% year-to-date with +$300 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 15.19% with -$448 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22Apr 29May 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HXS
+7.86%+7.36%+7.94%+29.23%+87.78%
HBNK
+7.86%+10.17%+15.19%+64.90%-
Flows
HXS
+$643 M+$276 M+$300 M+$1,138 M+$1,660 M
HBNK
-$205 M-$383 M-$448 M-$704 M-

HXS vs HBNK exposure

Countries

HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of May 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%

Diversification

HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
HXS
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 30, 2010July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HXS and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXS or HBNK?
As of May 8, 2026, HXS has returned 7.94% year to date, while HBNK has returned 15.19%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXS or HBNK?
As of May 8, 2026, HXS manages $6.39 B in assets, while HBNK manages $696.23 M. HXS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXS and HBNK managed?
HXS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXS and HBNK emphasize?
HXS is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXS or HBNK?
Year to date, HXS has seen +$300.43 M in net flows, compared with -$448.08 M for HBNK. HXS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXS and HBNK compare?
HXS has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of HXS and HBNK?
HXS's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. HBNK's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HXS or HBNK?
HXS holds 478 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HXS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HXS and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds