VS
When evaluating costs, IBQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IBQT
XIC
| AuM | $1.00 M | $33,165.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.22% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBQT | - | - | - | - | - |
XIC | +4.08% | +7.48% | +17.06% | +34.27% | +95.95% | |
| Flows | IBQT | - | - | - | - | - |
XIC | +$758 M | +$1,840 M | +$7,097 M | +$8,309 M | +$13,211 M |
IBQT vs XIC exposure
Countries
IBQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
IBQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of August 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IBQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
IBQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
IBQT
XIC
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | August 5, 2026 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about IBQT and XIC
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IBQT or XIC?
As of August 12, 2026, IBQT manages $1.00 M in assets, while XIC manages $33.17 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IBQT and XIC managed?
IBQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of IBQT and XIC compare?
IBQT has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about IBQT and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.