VS
When evaluating costs, IGB features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for FCCB. Performance-wise, IGB has returned 1.08% year-to-date with +$188 M in net flows, whereas FCCB is at 1.79% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IGB
FCCB
| AuM | $472.35 M | $4,997.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.57% | 0.29% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.30% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGB | +1.81% | -1.54% | -1.08% | -0.72% | +19.22% |
FCCB | +2.03% | +0.75% | +1.79% | +0.55% | +14.41% | |
| Flows | IGB | -$31 M | +$45 M | +$188 M | +$220 M | +$433 M |
FCCB | +$145 M | +$473 M | +$2,026 M | +$2,428 M | +$4,743 M |
IGB vs FCCB exposure
Countries
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
IGB
FCCB
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada Systematic Canadian Bond GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.98% | 3.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 18, 2013 | September 25, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about IGB and FCCB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IGB or FCCB?
As of November 5, 2026, IGB has returned -1.08% year to date, while FCCB has returned 1.79%. FCCB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IGB or FCCB?
As of November 5, 2026, IGB manages $472.35 M in assets, while FCCB manages $5.00 B. FCCB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IGB and FCCB managed?
IGB is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. FCCB is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Systematic Canadian Bond GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IGB or FCCB?
Year to date, IGB has seen +$188.15 M in net flows, compared with +$2,026.24 M for FCCB. FCCB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IGB and FCCB compare?
IGB has an expense ratio of 0.57%, while FCCB has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.