VS
Compare Invesco Morningstar Global Energy Transition Index ETF (IGET.F) vs iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IGET.F provides Utilities, Industrials, and Materials exposures, while XCLN is primarily weighted in Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, IGET.F features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for XCLN. Performance-wise, IGET.F has returned 27.47% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XCLN is at 30% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IGET.F
XCLN
| AuM | $1.14 M | $26.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.73% | -0.88% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGET.F | +7.30% | +13.91% | +27.47% | +53.47% | - |
XCLN | +12.28% | +16.43% | +30.00% | +71.63% | +17.79% | |
| Flows | IGET.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | - |
XCLN | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$6 M | +$9 M | +$16 M |
IGET.F vs XCLN exposure
Countries
IGET.F
Other
25.55%
USA
25.29%
Germany
8.93%
Ireland
7.25%
Canada
7.13%
Other
25.85%
XCLN
USA
42.28%
China
17.62%
Brazil
8.49%
Spain
8.21%
Other
23.41%
Sectors
IGET.F
Other
41.86%
Utilities
21.20%
Industrials
13.75%
Materials
9.86%
Information Technology
8.21%
XCLN
Utilities
43.49%
Industrials
25.60%
Information Technology
14.44%
Other
13.29%
As of May 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IGET.F
CASHJPY00000
6.26%
TESLA
5.07%
US36828A1016
4.27%
IE000S9YS762
4.06%
ENGIE
3.64%
NEXTERA ENERGY
3.63%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
3.54%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
3.53%
QUANTA SERVICES
3.40%
IBERDROLA SA
3.21%
XCLN
US65290E1010
10.18%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
9.41%
FIRST SOLAR
6.14%
IBERDROLA SA
5.77%
YANGTZE POWER
4.71%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
3.20%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.04%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.91%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
2.69%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.24%
Diversification
IGET.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
40.61%
XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 99 total
50.29%
Characteristics
Compare
IGET.F
XCLN
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Global Energy Transition hedged NTR Index - CAD | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 20.39% | 1.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | April 26, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about IGET.F and XCLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IGET.F or XCLN?
As of May 12, 2026, IGET.F has returned 27.47% year to date, while XCLN has returned 30.00%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IGET.F or XCLN?
As of May 12, 2026, IGET.F manages $1.14 M in assets, while XCLN manages $26.72 M. XCLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IGET.F and XCLN managed?
IGET.F is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the Morningstar Global Energy Transition hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark. XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IGET.F and XCLN emphasize?
IGET.F is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Materials. XCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IGET.F or XCLN?
Year to date, IGET.F has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$6.45 M for XCLN. XCLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IGET.F and XCLN compare?
IGET.F has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of IGET.F and XCLN?
IGET.F's largest holdings include TESLA and ENGIE. XCLN's top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGET.F or XCLN?
IGET.F holds 44 securities, while XCLN holds 90. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IGET.F and XCLN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.