VS
When evaluating costs, ILGB features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.09% for XBB. Performance-wise, ILGB has returned 2.86% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XBB is at 0.07% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ILGB
XBB
| AuM | $15.95 M | $10,955.39 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.95% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILGB | -1.30% | -2.25% | -2.86% | -3.25% | +17.78% |
XBB | -0.06% | -1.12% | -0.07% | -1.25% | +15.79% | |
| Flows | ILGB | -$1 M | -$2 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$2 M |
XBB | +$164 M | +$1,077 M | +$2,126 M | +$2,700 M | +$4,882 M |
ILGB vs XBB exposure
Countries
ILGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XBB
Canada
96.80%
Sectors
ILGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XBB
Sovereign
33.82%
Municipal
28.72%
Finance
14.06%
Government Agencies
7.21%
Other
16.19%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ILGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XBB
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
1.54%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
1.52%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
1.50%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2036, CAD
1.46%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2035, CAD
1.40%
Canada, Bonds 3% 1sep2031, CAD
1.28%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD
1.21%
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
1.21%
Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1dec2057, CAD
1.16%
Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1sep2029, CAD
1.14%
Diversification
ILGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XBB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,904 total
13.40%
Characteristics
Compare
ILGB
XBB
| Provider | IA Clarington | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.48% | 3.52% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 25, 2021 | November 20, 2000 |
Frequently asked questions about ILGB and XBB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ILGB or XBB?
As of October 20, 2026, ILGB has returned -2.86% year to date, while XBB has returned -0.07%. XBB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ILGB or XBB?
As of October 20, 2026, ILGB manages $15.95 M in assets, while XBB manages $10.96 B. XBB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ILGB and XBB managed?
ILGB is actively managed by IA Clarington. It does not track an index. XBB is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ILGB or XBB?
Year to date, ILGB has seen -$0.79 M in net flows, compared with +$2,126.21 M for XBB. XBB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ILGB and XBB compare?
ILGB has an expense ratio of 0.95%, while XBB has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about ILGB and XBB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.