INOC
Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF

Full INOC fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. INOC provides Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Industrials exposures, while HEWB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, INOC features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, INOC has returned 13.58% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 35.73% with +$23 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.0%Jun 17Jun 25Jul 3Jul 10Jul 17

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
INOC
+1.99%+6.00%+13.58%+21.63%+59.12%
HEWB
+6.03%+19.86%+35.73%+71.14%+157.48%
Flows
INOC
-$0 M-$2 M-$3 M-$5 M-$7 M
HEWB
+$9 M+$16 M+$23 M+$22 M+$25 M

INOC vs HEWB exposure

Countries

INOC
Canada
92.04%
Other
7.96%
HEWB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

INOC
Finance
19.10%
Non-Energy Materials
14.52%
Industrials
13.66%
Energy
13.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.38%
Technology
7.81%
Other
20.16%
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

INOC
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
5.59%
ARC Resources Ltd.
4.92%
Extendicare, Inc.
4.35%
AltaGas Ltd.
4.28%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
4.27%
Constellation Software, Inc.
4.21%
Canadian National Railway Co.
4.21%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.17%
Intact Financial Corp.
4.06%
CCL Industries, Inc.
3.99%
HEWB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

INOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
44.05%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
INOC
HEWB
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNasdaq Inovestor Canada Net Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.00%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 13, 2017January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about INOC and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: INOC or HEWB?
As of July 17, 2026, INOC has returned 13.58% year to date, while HEWB has returned 35.73%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: INOC or HEWB?
As of July 17, 2026, INOC manages $33.15 M in assets, while HEWB manages $353.97 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are INOC and HEWB managed?
INOC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Nasdaq Inovestor Canada Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do INOC and HEWB emphasize?
INOC is most exposed to Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Industrials. HEWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: INOC or HEWB?
Year to date, INOC has seen -$3.22 M in net flows, compared with +$23.13 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of INOC and HEWB compare?
INOC has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of INOC and HEWB?
INOC's largest holdings include Hammond Power Solutions, Inc., ARC Resources Ltd., and Extendicare, Inc.. HEWB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: INOC or HEWB?
INOC holds 24 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, INOC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about INOC and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds