VS
Compare CI International Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (IQD) vs iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IQD provides Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials exposures, while XIN is primarily weighted in Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, IQD features a management fee (MER) of 0.48%, compared to 0.5% for XIN. Performance-wise, IQD has returned 5.53% year-to-date with -$28 M in net flows, whereas XIN is at 10.26% with +$140 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IQD
XIN
| AuM | $148.91 M | $1,921.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.52% | 0.48% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.62% | -1.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IQD | +4.28% | +5.44% | +5.53% | +13.59% | +31.08% |
XIN | +3.30% | +7.71% | +10.26% | +22.13% | +56.15% | |
| Flows | IQD | -$2 M | -$7 M | -$28 M | -$80 M | +$42 M |
XIN | +$15 M | +$24 M | +$140 M | +$192 M | +$109 M |
IQD vs XIN exposure
Countries
IQD
Japan
19.50%
United Kingdom
16.44%
France
13.15%
Germany
9.63%
Netherlands
8.08%
Other
33.20%
XIN
Japan
22.83%
United Kingdom
14.35%
Switzerland
9.27%
France
9.08%
Germany
9.00%
Other
35.47%
Sectors
IQD
Industrials
24.06%
Consumer Discretionary
19.54%
Financials
15.31%
Information Technology
8.86%
Health Care
7.21%
Other
25.02%
XIN
Financials
23.75%
Industrials
18.74%
Information Technology
9.43%
Consumer Discretionary
8.16%
Health Care
7.38%
Other
32.54%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IQD
TOYOTA
4.86%
BP
3.66%
INDUSTRIA DISENO TEXTIL
3.27%
LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITT
3.24%
BBVA
2.87%
ASTRAZENECA
2.67%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
2.48%
ING GROEP
2.39%
DK0062498333
2.34%
L OREAL S.A.
2.21%
XIN
ASML HOLDING
2.57%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.45%
ASTRAZENECA
1.36%
CH1499059983
1.32%
NOVARTIS
1.30%
NESTLE SA
1.20%
SHELL PLC
1.19%
SIEMENS
1.04%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.97%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.94%
Diversification
IQD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 298 total
29.99%
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 691 total
13.34%
Characteristics
Compare
IQD
XIN
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.04% | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 12, 2016 | September 6, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about IQD and XIN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IQD or XIN?
As of June 12, 2026, IQD has returned 5.53% year to date, while XIN has returned 10.26%. XIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IQD or XIN?
As of June 12, 2026, IQD manages $148.91 M in assets, while XIN manages $1.92 B. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IQD and XIN managed?
IQD is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IQD and XIN emphasize?
IQD is most exposed to Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials. XIN is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IQD or XIN?
Year to date, IQD has seen -$28.44 M in net flows, compared with +$140.01 M for XIN. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IQD and XIN compare?
IQD has an expense ratio of 0.52%, while XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What are the top holdings of IQD and XIN?
IQD's largest holdings include TOYOTA and BP. XIN's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IQD or XIN?
IQD holds 282 securities, while XIN holds 651. On holdings count, XIN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IQD and XIN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.