VS
Compare CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF) vs CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IUMF provides Technology, Healthcare, and Finance exposures, while CUSM.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, IUMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, IUMF has returned 16.83% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 14.2% with +$29 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IUMF
CUSM.B
| AuM | $106.90 M | $222.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUMF | -2.23% | +2.03% | +16.83% | +18.79% | +51.24% |
CUSM.B | -1.94% | +1.24% | +14.20% | +19.34% | +78.16% | |
| Flows | IUMF | -$3 M | -$9 M | -$25 M | -$30 M | +$59 M |
CUSM.B | +$2 M | -$4 M | +$29 M | +$52 M | +$58 M |
IUMF vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
IUMF
USA
96.79%
CUSM.B
USA
95.88%
Sectors
IUMF
Technology
40.97%
Healthcare
12.99%
Finance
11.07%
Industrials
10.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.39%
Other
13.74%
CUSM.B
Technology
42.23%
Finance
14.34%
Healthcare
9.30%
Industrials
8.80%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.63%
Other
16.70%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IUMF
Apple, Inc.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.11%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.62%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
CUSM.B
Apple, Inc.
7.00%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.67%
Microsoft Corp.
4.14%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.59%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.40%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.50%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.47%
Diversification
IUMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 633 total
35.28%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 995 total
33.65%
Characteristics
Compare
IUMF
CUSM.B
| Provider | CI | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.66% | 0.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about IUMF and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IUMF or CUSM.B?
As of September 4, 2026, IUMF has returned 16.83% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 14.20%. IUMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IUMF or CUSM.B?
As of September 4, 2026, IUMF manages $106.90 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $222.26 M. CUSM.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IUMF and CUSM.B managed?
IUMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do IUMF and CUSM.B emphasize?
IUMF is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IUMF or CUSM.B?
Year to date, IUMF has seen -$24.84 M in net flows, compared with +$28.52 M for CUSM.B. CUSM.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IUMF and CUSM.B compare?
IUMF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of IUMF and CUSM.B?
IUMF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. CUSM.B's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IUMF or CUSM.B?
IUMF holds 629 securities, while CUSM.B holds 985. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.