VS
Compare CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF) vs Desjardins RI USA - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IUMF provides Technology, Healthcare, and Finance exposures, while DRMU is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, IUMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.2% for DRMU. Performance-wise, IUMF has returned 16.83% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas DRMU is at 13.89% with -$189 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IUMF
DRMU
| AuM | $106.90 M | $95.99 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUMF | -2.23% | +2.03% | +16.83% | +18.79% | +51.24% |
DRMU | -1.55% | +1.57% | +13.89% | +19.63% | +76.71% | |
| Flows | IUMF | -$3 M | -$9 M | -$25 M | -$30 M | +$59 M |
DRMU | -$237 M | -$237 M | -$189 M | -$191 M | -$150 M |
IUMF vs DRMU exposure
Countries
IUMF
USA
96.79%
DRMU
USA
97.19%
Sectors
IUMF
Technology
40.97%
Healthcare
12.99%
Finance
11.07%
Industrials
10.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.39%
Other
13.74%
DRMU
Technology
44.53%
Finance
13.96%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.15%
Healthcare
9.14%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
15.39%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IUMF
Apple, Inc.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.11%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.62%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
DRMU
Apple, Inc.
7.68%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.05%
Microsoft Corp.
4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Broadcom Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.84%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.49%
Diversification
IUMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 633 total
35.28%
DRMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
36.29%
Characteristics
Compare
IUMF
DRMU
| Provider | CI | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.66% | 1.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | September 27, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about IUMF and DRMU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IUMF or DRMU?
As of September 4, 2026, IUMF has returned 16.83% year to date, while DRMU has returned 13.89%. IUMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IUMF or DRMU?
As of September 4, 2026, IUMF manages $106.90 M in assets, while DRMU manages $95.99 M. IUMF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IUMF and DRMU managed?
IUMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. DRMU is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do IUMF and DRMU emphasize?
IUMF is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. DRMU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IUMF or DRMU?
Year to date, IUMF has seen -$24.84 M in net flows, compared with -$188.77 M for DRMU. IUMF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IUMF and DRMU compare?
IUMF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while DRMU has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of IUMF and DRMU?
IUMF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. DRMU's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IUMF or DRMU?
IUMF holds 629 securities, while DRMU holds 502. On holdings count, IUMF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IUMF and DRMU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.