VS
Compare CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IUMF provides Technology, Healthcare, and Finance exposures, while HULC is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, IUMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, IUMF has returned 20.43% year-to-date with -$32 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 16.34% with +$236 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IUMF
HULC
| AuM | $102.43 M | $873.74 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.22% | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUMF | +1.62% | +4.38% | +20.43% | +19.46% | +69.84% |
HULC | -0.58% | +3.80% | +16.34% | +15.65% | +94.80% | |
| Flows | IUMF | -$5 M | -$12 M | -$32 M | -$36 M | +$52 M |
HULC | +$37 M | +$86 M | +$236 M | +$276 M | +$145 M |
IUMF vs HULC exposure
Countries
IUMF
USA
96.75%
HULC
USA
96.50%
Sectors
IUMF
Technology
42.33%
Healthcare
12.87%
Finance
10.79%
Industrials
10.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.73%
Other
13.68%
HULC
Technology
45.22%
Finance
13.23%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.71%
Industrials
7.60%
Other
15.90%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IUMF
Apple, Inc.
8.40%
Microsoft Corp.
6.37%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.34%
Visa, Inc.
2.98%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.37%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.30%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.94%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.90%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.59%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.72%
Apple, Inc.
6.82%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.98%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.62%
Diversification
IUMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 631 total
36.09%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 493 total
37.25%
Characteristics
Compare
IUMF
HULC
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.67% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | February 6, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about IUMF and HULC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IUMF or HULC?
As of October 20, 2026, IUMF has returned 20.43% year to date, while HULC has returned 16.34%. IUMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IUMF or HULC?
As of October 20, 2026, IUMF manages $102.43 M in assets, while HULC manages $873.74 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IUMF and HULC managed?
IUMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IUMF and HULC emphasize?
IUMF is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IUMF or HULC?
Year to date, IUMF has seen -$32.35 M in net flows, compared with +$235.52 M for HULC. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IUMF and HULC compare?
IUMF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of IUMF and HULC?
IUMF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and NVIDIA Corp.. HULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IUMF or HULC?
IUMF holds 627 securities, while HULC holds 490. On holdings count, IUMF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.