VS
Compare CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF) vs CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IUMF and IUMF.F provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. When evaluating costs, IUMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.34% for IUMF.F. Performance-wise, IUMF has returned 17.11% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas IUMF.F is at 14.74% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IUMF
IUMF.F
| AuM | $107.16 M | $15.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | -0.55% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUMF | -1.99% | +2.98% | +17.11% | +20.52% | +51.60% |
IUMF.F | -0.19% | +3.11% | +14.74% | +17.97% | +42.61% | |
| Flows | IUMF | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$25 M | -$30 M | +$59 M |
IUMF.F | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$1 M | +$0 M | +$9 M |
IUMF vs IUMF.F exposure
Countries
IUMF
USA
95.16%
IUMF.F
USA
95.16%
Sectors
IUMF
Technology
40.95%
Healthcare
12.99%
Finance
11.11%
Industrials
10.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.39%
Other
14.04%
IUMF.F
Technology
40.95%
Healthcare
12.99%
Finance
11.11%
Industrials
10.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.39%
Other
14.04%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IUMF
Apple, Inc.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.11%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.62%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
IUMF.F
Apple, Inc.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.11%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.62%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
Diversification
IUMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 633 total
35.28%
IUMF.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 633 total
35.28%
Characteristics
Compare
IUMF
IUMF.F
| Provider | CI | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor CAD Hedged Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.66% | 0.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | July 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about IUMF and IUMF.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IUMF or IUMF.F?
As of September 3, 2026, IUMF has returned 17.11% year to date, while IUMF.F has returned 14.74%. IUMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IUMF or IUMF.F?
As of September 3, 2026, IUMF manages $107.16 M in assets, while IUMF.F manages $15.61 M. IUMF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IUMF and IUMF.F managed?
IUMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. IUMF.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor CAD Hedged Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IUMF and IUMF.F emphasize?
IUMF is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. IUMF.F is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IUMF or IUMF.F?
Year to date, IUMF has seen -$24.84 M in net flows, compared with -$1.11 M for IUMF.F. IUMF.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IUMF and IUMF.F compare?
IUMF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while IUMF.F has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What are the top holdings of IUMF and IUMF.F?
IUMF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. IUMF.F's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IUMF or IUMF.F?
IUMF holds 624 securities, while IUMF.F holds 624. On holdings count, IUMF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.