VS
Compare CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF) vs TD S&P 500 Index ETF (THU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IUMF provides Technology, Healthcare, and Finance exposures, while THU is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, IUMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.06% for THU. Performance-wise, IUMF has returned 17.11% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas THU is at 12.48% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IUMF
THU
| AuM | $107.16 M | $156.03 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.07% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | -0.15% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUMF | -1.99% | +2.98% | +17.11% | +20.52% | +51.60% |
THU | +0.10% | +2.21% | +12.48% | +18.96% | +71.31% | |
| Flows | IUMF | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$25 M | -$30 M | +$59 M |
THU | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$1 M | +$7 M | +$78 M |
IUMF vs THU exposure
Countries
IUMF
USA
95.16%
THU
USA
95.39%
Sectors
IUMF
Technology
40.95%
Healthcare
12.99%
Finance
11.11%
Industrials
10.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.39%
Other
14.04%
THU
Technology
44.04%
Finance
13.36%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.12%
Healthcare
8.97%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
16.69%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IUMF
Apple, Inc.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.11%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.62%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
THU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.16%
Apple, Inc.
6.74%
Microsoft Corp.
5.20%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.86%
Tesla, Inc.
1.59%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.48%
Diversification
IUMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 633 total
35.28%
THU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
36.70%
Characteristics
Compare
IUMF
THU
| Provider | CI | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.66% | 0.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | March 22, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about IUMF and THU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IUMF or THU?
As of September 3, 2026, IUMF has returned 17.11% year to date, while THU has returned 12.48%. IUMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IUMF or THU?
As of September 3, 2026, IUMF manages $107.16 M in assets, while THU manages $156.03 M. THU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IUMF and THU managed?
IUMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. THU is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IUMF and THU emphasize?
IUMF is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. THU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IUMF or THU?
Year to date, IUMF has seen -$24.84 M in net flows, compared with -$0.91 M for THU. THU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IUMF and THU compare?
IUMF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while THU has an expense ratio of 0.07%.
What are the top holdings of IUMF and THU?
IUMF's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. THU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IUMF or THU?
IUMF holds 624 securities, while THU holds 496. On holdings count, IUMF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.