VS
Compare JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) vs CI U.S. Enhanced Value Index ETF (CVLU.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. JAVA provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while CVLU.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, JAVA features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.3% for CVLU.B. Performance-wise, JAVA has returned 17.07% year-to-date with +$97 M in net flows, whereas CVLU.B is at 21.64% with -$44 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
JAVA
CVLU.B
| AuM | $117.30 M | $48.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.32% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - |
CVLU.B | +0.91% | +8.12% | +21.64% | +31.20% | - | |
| Flows | JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
CVLU.B | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$44 M | -$87 M | - |
JAVA vs CVLU.B exposure
Countries
JAVA
USA
93.96%
CVLU.B
USA
95.42%
Sectors
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
22.86%
CVLU.B
Technology
34.95%
Finance
16.14%
Healthcare
14.82%
Industrials
9.00%
Other
25.09%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
CVLU.B
Microsoft Corp.
7.67%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.64%
Apple, Inc.
4.82%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.45%
Johnson & Johnson
1.44%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.33%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.25%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Diversification
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
CVLU.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 810 total
30.01%
Characteristics
Compare
JAVA
CVLU.B
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | VettaFi US Enhanced Value Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.67% | 1.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 19, 2025 | January 16, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about JAVA and CVLU.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: JAVA or CVLU.B?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA has returned 17.07% year to date, while CVLU.B has returned 21.64%. CVLU.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: JAVA or CVLU.B?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA manages $117.30 M in assets, while CVLU.B manages $48.79 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are JAVA and CVLU.B managed?
JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index. CVLU.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the VettaFi US Enhanced Value Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do JAVA and CVLU.B emphasize?
JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. CVLU.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: JAVA or CVLU.B?
Year to date, JAVA has seen +$96.64 M in net flows, compared with -$44.14 M for CVLU.B. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of JAVA and CVLU.B compare?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while CVLU.B has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of JAVA and CVLU.B?
JAVA's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. CVLU.B's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JAVA or CVLU.B?
JAVA holds 151 securities, while CVLU.B holds 806. On holdings count, CVLU.B is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.