VS
Compare JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) vs CI Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II (PXS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. JAVA provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while PXS is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, JAVA features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.44% for PXS. Performance-wise, JAVA has returned 17.07% year-to-date with +$97 M in net flows, whereas PXS is at 22% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
JAVA
PXS
| AuM | $117.30 M | $55.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - |
PXS | -1.10% | +4.94% | +22.00% | +29.73% | +80.64% | |
| Flows | JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
PXS | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$8 M | -$16 M |
JAVA vs PXS exposure
Countries
JAVA
USA
93.96%
PXS
USA
95.19%
Sectors
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
22.86%
PXS
Technology
24.48%
Finance
19.57%
Healthcare
12.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.64%
Industrials
7.70%
Other
26.11%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
PXS
Apple, Inc.
4.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.49%
Microsoft Corp.
2.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.97%
US30233Q1085
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Intel Corp.
1.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.46%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.36%
Diversification
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
PXS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 999 total
22.33%
Characteristics
Compare
JAVA
PXS
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.67% | 1.18% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 19, 2025 | April 14, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about JAVA and PXS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: JAVA or PXS?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA has returned 17.07% year to date, while PXS has returned 22.00%. PXS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: JAVA or PXS?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA manages $117.30 M in assets, while PXS manages $55.94 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are JAVA and PXS managed?
JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index. PXS is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do JAVA and PXS emphasize?
JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. PXS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: JAVA or PXS?
Year to date, JAVA has seen +$96.64 M in net flows, compared with +$7.72 M for PXS. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of JAVA and PXS compare?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while PXS has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of JAVA and PXS?
JAVA's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. PXS's top holdings include Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JAVA or PXS?
JAVA holds 151 securities, while PXS holds 990. On holdings count, PXS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.