VS
Compare JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) vs CI Invesco FTSE RAFI US Fundamental Index ETF (PXU.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. JAVA and PXU.F provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, JAVA features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.44% for PXU.F. Performance-wise, JAVA has returned 17.07% year-to-date with +$97 M in net flows, whereas PXU.F is at 19.55% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
JAVA
PXU.F
| AuM | $117.30 M | $66.97 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - |
PXU.F | +0.72% | +5.18% | +19.55% | +27.24% | +69.66% | |
| Flows | JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
PXU.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$1 M | -$78 M |
JAVA vs PXU.F exposure
Countries
JAVA
USA
93.96%
PXU.F
USA
93.61%
Sectors
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
22.86%
PXU.F
Finance
23.39%
Technology
19.11%
Healthcare
12.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.55%
Industrials
7.16%
Other
27.47%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
PXU.F
Microsoft Corp.
2.62%
Apple, Inc.
2.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.20%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.66%
US30233Q1085
1.62%
Bank of America Corp.
1.37%
Intel Corp.
1.17%
Chevron Corp.
1.16%
Diversification
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
PXU.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.44%
Characteristics
Compare
JAVA
PXU.F
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.67% | 1.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 19, 2025 | January 26, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about JAVA and PXU.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: JAVA or PXU.F?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA has returned 17.07% year to date, while PXU.F has returned 19.55%. PXU.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: JAVA or PXU.F?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA manages $117.30 M in assets, while PXU.F manages $66.97 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are JAVA and PXU.F managed?
JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index. PXU.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do JAVA and PXU.F emphasize?
JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. PXU.F is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: JAVA or PXU.F?
Year to date, JAVA has seen +$96.64 M in net flows, compared with +$0.81 M for PXU.F. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of JAVA and PXU.F compare?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while PXU.F has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of JAVA and PXU.F?
JAVA's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. PXU.F's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JAVA or PXU.F?
JAVA holds 151 securities, while PXU.F holds 985. On holdings count, PXU.F is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.