VS
JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that JAVA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Healthcare, while VUDV leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, JAVA features a management fee (MER) of 0.44%, compared to 0.28% for VUDV. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
JAVA
VUDV
| AuM | $117.30 M | $63.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.44% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.44% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - |
VUDV | -2.24% | +2.49% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
VUDV | +$4 M | +$29 M | - | - | - |
JAVA vs VUDV exposure
Countries
JAVA
USA
93.96%
VUDV
USA
91.60%
Other
8.40%
Sectors
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
22.86%
VUDV
Finance
21.70%
Technology
16.57%
Healthcare
12.70%
Industrials
10.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
30.09%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
VUDV
Broadcom Inc.
7.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.82%
US30233Q1085
2.63%
Johnson & Johnson
2.51%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.86%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.80%
Bank of America Corp.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.52%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.50%
Chevron Corp.
1.48%
Diversification
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
VUDV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 604 total
26.13%
Characteristics
Compare
JAVA
VUDV
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.67% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 19, 2025 | March 23, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about JAVA and VUDV
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: JAVA or VUDV?
As of September 3, 2026, JAVA manages $117.30 M in assets, while VUDV manages $63.72 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are JAVA and VUDV managed?
JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index. VUDV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do JAVA and VUDV emphasize?
JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. VUDV is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of JAVA and VUDV compare?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while VUDV has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of JAVA and VUDV?
JAVA's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. VUDV's top holdings include Broadcom Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: JAVA or VUDV?
JAVA holds 151 securities, while VUDV holds 596. On holdings count, VUDV is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.