VS
When evaluating costs, KILO features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.24% for KILO.U. Performance-wise, KILO has returned 6.3% year-to-date with +$42 M in net flows, whereas KILO.U is at 6.92% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
KILO
KILO.U
| AuM | $530.13 M | $32.08 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.24% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KILO | +2.15% | -5.06% | +6.30% | +36.94% | +121.94% |
KILO.U | +2.23% | -4.62% | +6.92% | +39.75% | +131.10% | |
| Flows | KILO | +$5 M | +$13 M | +$42 M | +$154 M | +$229 M |
KILO.U | +$2 M | -$3 M | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$11 M |
KILO vs KILO.U exposure
Countries
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
KILO.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
KILO.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
KILO.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
KILO.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
KILO
KILO.U
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Gold Price AM - USD | LBMA Gold Price AM - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Commodity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 31, 2018 | October 15, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about KILO and KILO.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: KILO or KILO.U?
As of April 30, 2026, KILO has returned 6.30% year to date, while KILO.U has returned 6.92%. KILO.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: KILO or KILO.U?
As of April 30, 2026, KILO manages $530.13 M in assets, while KILO.U manages $32.08 M. KILO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are KILO and KILO.U managed?
KILO is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price AM - USD benchmark. KILO.U is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price AM - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: KILO or KILO.U?
Year to date, KILO has seen +$41.66 M in net flows, compared with +$0.63 M for KILO.U. KILO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of KILO and KILO.U compare?
KILO has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while KILO.U has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
Recent articles about KILO and KILO.U
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.