VS
Compare Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. KNGX provides Industrials, Energy, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, KNGX features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, KNGX has returned 17.12% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 11.61% with -$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
KNGX
ZUT
| AuM | $17.12 M | $805.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.36% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KNGX | +0.92% | +4.38% | +17.12% | +30.64% | - |
ZUT | -5.59% | -7.33% | +11.61% | +17.34% | +47.29% | |
| Flows | KNGX | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$7 M | +$8 M | - |
ZUT | +$5 M | -$17 M | -$95 M | -$106 M | +$217 M |
KNGX vs ZUT exposure
Countries
KNGX
France
18.81%
United Kingdom
17.92%
Japan
14.26%
Germany
12.78%
Other
36.23%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
KNGX
Industrials
31.07%
Energy
13.47%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.46%
Technology
10.14%
Telecommunications
9.48%
Other
25.38%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
KNGX
Equinor ASA
5.67%
Shell Plc
4.57%
Deutsche Post AG
4.56%
A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S
4.15%
Sony Group Corp.
4.15%
Vodafone Group Plc
4.13%
Telefónica SA
3.87%
Holcim Ltd.
3.82%
Sanofi
3.61%
VINCI SA
3.39%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
KNGX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 50 total
41.92%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
KNGX
ZUT
| Provider | Brompton Group | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Brompton Index One International Cash Flow Kings Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.17% | 2.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about KNGX and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: KNGX or ZUT?
As of September 10, 2026, KNGX has returned 17.12% year to date, while ZUT has returned 11.61%. KNGX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: KNGX or ZUT?
As of September 10, 2026, KNGX manages $17.12 M in assets, while ZUT manages $805.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are KNGX and ZUT managed?
KNGX is passively managed by Brompton Group. It tracks the Brompton Index One International Cash Flow Kings Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do KNGX and ZUT emphasize?
KNGX is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: KNGX or ZUT?
Year to date, KNGX has seen +$6.81 M in net flows, compared with -$94.91 M for ZUT. KNGX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of KNGX and ZUT compare?
KNGX has an expense ratio of 0.36%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of KNGX and ZUT?
KNGX's largest holdings include Equinor ASA, Shell Plc, and Deutsche Post AG. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: KNGX or ZUT?
KNGX holds 50 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, KNGX is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about KNGX and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.