VS
Compare Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield ETF (LIFE) vs CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. LIFE and FHI provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care. When evaluating costs, LIFE features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.65% for FHI. Performance-wise, LIFE has returned 7.72% year-to-date with +$21 M in net flows, whereas FHI is at 2.8% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
LIFE
FHI
| AuM | $248.81 M | $109.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIFE | -2.64% | -9.03% | -7.72% | +1.77% | -5.03% |
FHI | -1.56% | -5.97% | -2.80% | +8.34% | +14.34% | |
| Flows | LIFE | -$12 M | +$9 M | +$21 M | +$67 M | +$100 M |
FHI | +$5 M | +$8 M | +$12 M | +$14 M | +$27 M |
LIFE vs FHI exposure
Countries
LIFE
USA
72.00%
Other
23.09%
FHI
USA
96.81%
Sectors
LIFE
Health Care
71.49%
Other
28.51%
FHI
Health Care
101.88%
As of May 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
LIFE
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
6.54%
GILEAD SCIENCES
6.11%
PFIZER
6.06%
MERCK & CO INC
6.00%
AMGEN-T
5.84%
ABBVIE
5.42%
US80105N1054
5.42%
MEDTRONIC PLC
4.91%
STRYKER
4.85%
LILLY
4.64%
FHI
MERCK & CO INC
5.35%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.33%
ABBVIE
5.33%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS
5.30%
PFIZER
5.27%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
5.22%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.21%
AMGEN-T
5.10%
LILLY
5.10%
GILEAD SCIENCES
5.08%
Diversification
LIFE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
55.78%
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
52.28%
Characteristics
Compare
LIFE
FHI
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.24% | 8.43% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 25, 2017 | June 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about LIFE and FHI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: LIFE or FHI?
As of May 20, 2026, LIFE has returned -7.72% year to date, while FHI has returned -2.80%. FHI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: LIFE or FHI?
As of May 20, 2026, LIFE manages $248.81 M in assets, while FHI manages $109.73 M. LIFE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are LIFE and FHI managed?
LIFE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do LIFE and FHI emphasize?
LIFE is most exposed to Health Care. FHI is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: LIFE or FHI?
Year to date, LIFE has seen +$20.51 M in net flows, compared with +$12.36 M for FHI. LIFE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of LIFE and FHI compare?
LIFE has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of LIFE and FHI?
LIFE's largest holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, GILEAD SCIENCES, and PFIZER. FHI's top holdings include MERCK & CO INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB, and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: LIFE or FHI?
LIFE holds 15 securities, while FHI holds 20. On holdings count, FHI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about LIFE and FHI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.