VS
CI Global Longevity Economy Fund ETF (LONG) and CI Global Alpha Innovation ETF (CINV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that LONG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while CINV leans towards Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, LONG features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.8% for CINV. Performance-wise, LONG has returned 4.91% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas CINV is at 10.71% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
LONG
CINV
| AuM | $4.27 M | $13.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.80% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.95% | 1.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LONG | -1.73% | +4.85% | +4.91% | +16.27% | +53.21% |
CINV | -0.41% | +9.54% | +10.71% | +20.78% | +113.51% | |
| Flows | LONG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
CINV | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$7 M |
LONG vs CINV exposure
Countries
LONG
USA
86.35%
Other
13.65%
CINV
USA
84.42%
Other
15.58%
Sectors
LONG
Technology
63.75%
Healthcare
28.85%
Other
7.41%
CINV
Technology
62.84%
Industrials
9.21%
Healthcare
8.72%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.19%
Other
11.05%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
LONG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.23%
DexCom, Inc.
7.94%
Broadcom Inc.
7.64%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
7.03%
Microsoft Corp.
6.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.92%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.65%
CINV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.01%
Broadcom Inc.
4.83%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.82%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.73%
Snowflake, Inc.
3.55%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
3.40%
Lam Research Corp.
3.26%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.20%
Diversification
LONG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
63.18%
CINV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
43.45%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about LONG and CINV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: LONG or CINV?
As of July 17, 2026, LONG has returned 4.91% year to date, while CINV has returned 10.71%. CINV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: LONG or CINV?
As of July 17, 2026, LONG manages $4.27 M in assets, while CINV manages $13.57 M. CINV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are LONG and CINV managed?
LONG is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CINV is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do LONG and CINV emphasize?
LONG is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CINV is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: LONG or CINV?
Year to date, LONG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$2.44 M for CINV. CINV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of LONG and CINV compare?
LONG has an expense ratio of 0.95%, while CINV has an expense ratio of 1.06%.
What are the top holdings of LONG and CINV?
LONG's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., DexCom, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. CINV's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LONG or CINV?
LONG holds 27 securities, while CINV holds 47. On holdings count, CINV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about LONG and CINV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.