VS
Compare CI Global Longevity Economy Fund ETF (LONG) vs CI Alternative North American Opportunities Fund (CNAO) to find the best fit for your portfolio. LONG provides Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while CNAO is primarily weighted in Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, LONG features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.9% for CNAO. Performance-wise, LONG has returned 4.91% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas CNAO is at 5.36% with -$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
LONG
CNAO
| AuM | $4.27 M | $47.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.90% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.95% | 1.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LONG | -1.73% | +4.85% | +4.91% | +16.27% | +53.21% |
CNAO | -0.44% | +7.48% | +5.36% | +11.37% | +60.49% | |
| Flows | LONG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
CNAO | +$1 M | -$2 M | -$4 M | -$3 M | +$41 M |
LONG vs CNAO exposure
Countries
LONG
USA
86.35%
Other
13.65%
CNAO
USA
83.96%
Canada
10.06%
Sectors
LONG
Technology
63.75%
Healthcare
28.85%
Other
7.41%
CNAO
Technology
66.80%
Healthcare
14.58%
Industrials
11.07%
Other
7.55%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
LONG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.23%
DexCom, Inc.
7.94%
Broadcom Inc.
7.64%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
7.03%
Microsoft Corp.
6.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.92%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.65%
CNAO
NVIDIA Corp.
7.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.08%
DexCom, Inc.
5.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.20%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
5.05%
Celestica, Inc.
4.84%
Microsoft Corp.
4.67%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.38%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.09%
Snowflake, Inc.
3.78%
Diversification
LONG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
63.18%
CNAO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
51.21%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about LONG and CNAO
Which ETF has performed better year to date: LONG or CNAO?
As of July 17, 2026, LONG has returned 4.91% year to date, while CNAO has returned 5.36%. CNAO is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: LONG or CNAO?
As of July 17, 2026, LONG manages $4.27 M in assets, while CNAO manages $47.35 M. CNAO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are LONG and CNAO managed?
LONG is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CNAO is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do LONG and CNAO emphasize?
LONG is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CNAO is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: LONG or CNAO?
Year to date, LONG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$3.80 M for CNAO. LONG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of LONG and CNAO compare?
LONG has an expense ratio of 0.95%, while CNAO has an expense ratio of 1.21%.
What are the top holdings of LONG and CNAO?
LONG's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., DexCom, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. CNAO's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and DexCom, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LONG or CNAO?
LONG holds 27 securities, while CNAO holds 35. On holdings count, CNAO is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.