VS
When evaluating costs, MCON features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.34% for FCIP. Performance-wise, MCON has returned 4.89% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas FCIP is at 3.38% with +$167 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MCON
FCIP
| AuM | $43.04 M | $282.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.34% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCON | -0.83% | -1.76% | +4.89% | +4.81% | +37.16% |
FCIP | +1.18% | -0.52% | +3.38% | +3.23% | - | |
| Flows | MCON | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$20 M | +$11 M |
FCIP | +$10 M | +$50 M | +$167 M | +$206 M | - |
MCON vs FCIP exposure
Countries
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIP
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIP
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIP
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIP
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
MCON
FCIP
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Cryptocurrencies, Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.31% | 3.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 29, 2020 | June 3, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about MCON and FCIP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCON or FCIP?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON has returned 4.89% year to date, while FCIP has returned 3.38%. MCON is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCON or FCIP?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON manages $43.04 M in assets, while FCIP manages $282.84 M. FCIP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCON and FCIP managed?
MCON is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. FCIP is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCON or FCIP?
Year to date, MCON has seen +$14.72 M in net flows, compared with +$166.94 M for FCIP. FCIP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCON and FCIP compare?
MCON has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while FCIP has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about MCON and FCIP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.