VS
When evaluating costs, MCON features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.27% for TCON. Performance-wise, MCON has returned 4.89% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas TCON is at 5.72% with +$52 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MCON
TCON
| AuM | $43.04 M | $137.22 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.27% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCON | -0.83% | -1.76% | +4.89% | +4.81% | +37.16% |
TCON | -0.14% | -0.66% | +5.72% | +5.71% | +35.62% | |
| Flows | MCON | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$20 M | +$11 M |
TCON | +$2 M | +$9 M | +$52 M | +$61 M | +$108 M |
MCON vs TCON exposure
Countries
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
TCON
Other
100.00%
Sectors
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
TCON
Other
100.00%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
TCON
CA87818P1036
59.91%
CA87239X1078
15.42%
CA87240Y1025
14.69%
CA87809R1001
9.97%
Diversification
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
TCON
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
99.99%
Characteristics
Compare
MCON
TCON
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.31% | 2.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 29, 2020 | August 18, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about MCON and TCON
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCON or TCON?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON has returned 4.89% year to date, while TCON has returned 5.72%. TCON is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCON or TCON?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON manages $43.04 M in assets, while TCON manages $137.22 M. TCON is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCON and TCON managed?
MCON is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. TCON is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCON or TCON?
Year to date, MCON has seen +$14.72 M in net flows, compared with +$51.97 M for TCON. TCON has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCON and TCON compare?
MCON has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while TCON has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about MCON and TCON
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.