VS
When evaluating costs, MCON features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.22% for VCNS. Performance-wise, MCON has returned 5.1% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas VCNS is at 6.01% with +$221 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MCON
VCNS
| AuM | $43.12 M | $988.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.25% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCON | -0.63% | -1.53% | +5.10% | +4.88% | +37.17% |
VCNS | +0.31% | -0.71% | +6.01% | +6.18% | +39.24% | |
| Flows | MCON | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$20 M | +$11 M |
VCNS | +$15 M | +$46 M | +$221 M | +$286 M | +$394 M |
MCON vs VCNS exposure
Countries
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
VCNS
Canada
45.42%
USA
28.88%
Other
25.70%
Sectors
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
VCNS
Sovereign
24.86%
Finance
18.35%
Technology
11.79%
Municipal
10.90%
Other
34.11%
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
VCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.34%
Apple, Inc.
1.25%
Microsoft Corp.
0.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.97%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.68%
Shopify, Inc.
0.64%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.63%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.62%
Canada, Bonds 3% 1sep2031, CAD
0.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.52%
Diversification
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,904 total
8.24%
Characteristics
Compare
MCON
VCNS
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | Vanguard |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.30% | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 29, 2020 | February 1, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about MCON and VCNS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCON or VCNS?
As of November 3, 2026, MCON has returned 5.10% year to date, while VCNS has returned 6.01%. VCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCON or VCNS?
As of November 3, 2026, MCON manages $43.12 M in assets, while VCNS manages $988.91 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCON and VCNS managed?
MCON is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCON or VCNS?
Year to date, MCON has seen +$14.72 M in net flows, compared with +$221.23 M for VCNS. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCON and VCNS compare?
MCON has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
Recent articles about MCON and VCNS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.