VS
When evaluating costs, MCON features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.18% for XINC. Performance-wise, MCON has returned 4.89% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas XINC is at 3.2% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MCON
XINC
| AuM | $43.04 M | $128.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCON | -0.83% | -1.76% | +4.89% | +4.81% | +37.16% |
XINC | +0.62% | -0.34% | +3.20% | +2.84% | +25.70% | |
| Flows | MCON | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$20 M | +$11 M |
XINC | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$30 M | +$35 M | +$88 M |
MCON vs XINC exposure
Countries
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
XINC
Canada
65.02%
USA
24.66%
Other
10.32%
Sectors
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
XINC
Sovereign
24.72%
Finance
22.84%
Municipal
14.46%
Other
37.98%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
XINC
CA46430T1093
51.00%
CA46431X1096
13.00%
US4642871507
9.01%
US46429B2676
7.90%
US4642886208
7.86%
CA46434T1057
5.02%
CA46430J1012
4.99%
CA46434U1021
1.02%
Diversification
MCON
Exposure data will be available soon
XINC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21,951 total
99.81%
Characteristics
Compare
MCON
XINC
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.31% | 3.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 29, 2020 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about MCON and XINC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCON or XINC?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON has returned 4.89% year to date, while XINC has returned 3.20%. MCON is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCON or XINC?
As of November 5, 2026, MCON manages $43.04 M in assets, while XINC manages $128.20 M. XINC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCON and XINC managed?
MCON is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. XINC is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCON or XINC?
Year to date, MCON has seen +$14.72 M in net flows, compared with +$30.48 M for XINC. XINC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCON and XINC compare?
MCON has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while XINC has an expense ratio of 0.18%.
Recent articles about MCON and XINC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.