VS
Compare Mackenzie Cyclical Tilt ETF (MCYC) vs Fidelity U.S. Value Index ETF (FCUV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MCYC provides Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials exposures, while FCUV is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials. When evaluating costs, MCYC features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.35% for FCUV. Performance-wise, MCYC has returned 13.66% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas FCUV is at 12.72% with +$992 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MCYC
FCUV
| AuM | $3.67 M | $3,536.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.98% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCYC | +2.48% | +16.55% | +13.66% | - | - |
FCUV | +3.38% | +12.07% | +12.72% | +37.53% | +101.95% | |
| Flows | MCYC | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - |
FCUV | +$202 M | +$537 M | +$992 M | +$1,651 M | +$2,632 M |
MCYC vs FCUV exposure
Countries
MCYC
USA
92.06%
Other
7.94%
FCUV
USA
96.03%
Sectors
MCYC
Information Technology
29.52%
Industrials
19.93%
Financials
14.78%
Consumer Discretionary
10.79%
Other
24.98%
FCUV
Information Technology
30.64%
Consumer Discretionary
15.38%
Financials
14.27%
Industrials
13.81%
Materials
9.12%
Utilities
8.40%
Other
8.38%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MCYC
NVIDIA
4.40%
APPLE
3.30%
MICROSOFT-T
2.44%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.89%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
1.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
0.82%
MORGAN STANLEY
0.79%
JPMORGAN CHASE
0.79%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
0.76%
FCUV
NVIDIA
6.36%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
5.19%
AMAZON.COM INC
5.09%
APPLE
4.92%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL
4.33%
PG&E
4.07%
MICROSOFT-T
3.96%
NEWMONT CORP
3.94%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.45%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
2.44%
Diversification
MCYC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 238 total
18.49%
FCUV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
42.75%
Characteristics
Compare
MCYC
FCUV
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 3, 2025 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about MCYC and FCUV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCYC or FCUV?
As of June 10, 2026, MCYC has returned 13.66% year to date, while FCUV has returned 12.72%. MCYC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCYC or FCUV?
As of June 10, 2026, MCYC manages $3.67 M in assets, while FCUV manages $3.54 B. FCUV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCYC and FCUV managed?
MCYC is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do MCYC and FCUV emphasize?
MCYC is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. FCUV is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCYC or FCUV?
Year to date, MCYC has seen +$1.09 M in net flows, compared with +$992.33 M for FCUV. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCYC and FCUV compare?
MCYC has an expense ratio of 0.55%, while FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
What are the top holdings of MCYC and FCUV?
MCYC's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. FCUV's top holdings include NVIDIA, CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCYC or FCUV?
MCYC holds 235 securities, while FCUV holds 87. On holdings count, MCYC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about MCYC and FCUV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.