VS
When evaluating costs, MEDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.85% for HHL. Performance-wise, MEDX has returned 6.86% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HHL is at 7.17% with +$205 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MEDX
HHL
| AuM | $2.57 M | $1,629.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MEDX | -1.82% | -10.14% | -6.86% | - | - |
HHL | +0.31% | -8.41% | -7.17% | +3.98% | +9.66% | |
| Flows | MEDX | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - |
HHL | +$61 M | +$167 M | +$205 M | +$378 M | +$596 M |
MEDX vs HHL exposure
Countries
MEDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HHL
USA
84.90%
Other
10.60%
Sectors
MEDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HHL
Health Care
89.40%
Other
10.60%
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MEDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HHL
MERCK & CO INC
5.70%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.60%
ABBVIE
5.60%
AMGEN-T
5.50%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.50%
ZOETIS INC
5.10%
LILLY
5.00%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
5.00%
ABBOTT LABS
5.00%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
4.90%
Diversification
MEDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HHL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
52.90%
Characteristics
Compare
MEDX
HHL
| Provider | Global X | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | VettaFi Equal Weight Global Healthcare NTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 10.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 30, 2025 | December 18, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about MEDX and HHL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MEDX or HHL?
As of April 24, 2026, MEDX has returned -6.86% year to date, while HHL has returned -7.17%. MEDX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MEDX or HHL?
As of April 24, 2026, MEDX manages $2.57 M in assets, while HHL manages $1.63 B. HHL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MEDX and HHL managed?
MEDX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the VettaFi Equal Weight Global Healthcare NTR Index - CAD benchmark. HHL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MEDX or HHL?
Year to date, MEDX has seen +$0.52 M in net flows, compared with +$205.22 M for HHL. HHL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MEDX and HHL compare?
MEDX has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while HHL has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
Recent articles about MEDX and HHL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.