VS
When evaluating costs, METU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
METU
ZUT
| AuM | $5.49 M | $816.24 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | METU | +42.20% | +32.47% | - | - | - |
ZUT | -4.33% | -5.42% | +13.46% | +19.30% | +47.99% | |
| Flows | METU | -$1 M | +$2 M | - | - | - |
ZUT | +$14 M | -$32 M | -$98 M | -$105 M | +$220 M |
METU vs ZUT exposure
Countries
METU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
METU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
METU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
METU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
METU
ZUT
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | META Price - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 27, 2026 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about METU and ZUT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: METU or ZUT?
As of September 17, 2026, METU manages $5.49 M in assets, while ZUT manages $816.24 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are METU and ZUT managed?
METU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the META Price - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of METU and ZUT compare?
METU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about METU and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.