VS
Compare Mackenzie GQE Global Equity ETF (MGQE) vs RBC Global Large-Cap Equity Fund (RGLE) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MGQE provides Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials exposures, while RGLE is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, MGQE features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.75% for RGLE. Performance-wise, MGQE has returned 12.46% year-to-date with +$287 M in net flows, whereas RGLE is at 9.07% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MGQE
RGLE
| AuM | $574.36 M | $1.40 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.88% | 1.02% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGQE | +0.27% | +9.74% | +12.46% | +34.21% | - |
RGLE | +2.31% | +10.84% | +9.07% | +22.43% | - | |
| Flows | MGQE | +$72 M | +$176 M | +$287 M | +$413 M | - |
RGLE | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - |
MGQE vs RGLE exposure
Countries
MGQE
USA
66.26%
Other
33.74%
RGLE
USA
60.17%
Other
16.22%
Other
23.61%
Sectors
MGQE
Information Technology
28.38%
Industrials
12.08%
Financials
10.48%
Communication Services
10.31%
Other
9.56%
Health Care
8.36%
Other
20.83%
RGLE
Information Technology
25.08%
Other
18.78%
Financials
12.04%
Industrials
10.92%
Consumer Discretionary
8.51%
Health Care
8.39%
Other
16.28%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MGQE
NVIDIA
6.84%
APPLE
5.24%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.96%
MICROSOFT-T
4.19%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.83%
META PLATFORMS
2.19%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.67%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
1.56%
MASTERCARD
1.20%
CATERPILLAR
1.18%
RGLE
NVIDIA
5.77%
APPLE
4.51%
MICROSOFT-T
3.60%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.00%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.89%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.39%
EXXON
1.36%
LILLY
1.07%
ASML HOLDING
0.98%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
0.83%
Diversification
MGQE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 150 total
31.85%
RGLE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 190 total
24.40%
Characteristics
Compare
MGQE
RGLE
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.33% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 10, 2024 | April 9, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about MGQE and RGLE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MGQE or RGLE?
As of June 10, 2026, MGQE has returned 12.46% year to date, while RGLE has returned 9.07%. MGQE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MGQE or RGLE?
As of June 10, 2026, MGQE manages $574.36 M in assets, while RGLE manages $1.40 M. MGQE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MGQE and RGLE managed?
MGQE is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. RGLE is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MGQE and RGLE emphasize?
MGQE is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. RGLE is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MGQE or RGLE?
Year to date, MGQE has seen +$287.06 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for RGLE. MGQE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MGQE and RGLE compare?
MGQE has an expense ratio of 0.88%, while RGLE has an expense ratio of 1.02%.
What are the top holdings of MGQE and RGLE?
MGQE's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. RGLE's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MGQE or RGLE?
MGQE holds 146 securities, while RGLE holds 185. On holdings count, RGLE is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about MGQE and RGLE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.