VS
When evaluating costs, MHCD features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.25% for CDIV. Performance-wise, MHCD has returned 13.31% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas CDIV is at 19.21% with +$905 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MHCD
CDIV
| AuM | $163.28 M | $2,053.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.25% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MHCD | +4.71% | +5.39% | +13.31% | +19.27% | +46.55% |
CDIV | +2.81% | +1.02% | +19.21% | +27.15% | +107.03% | |
| Flows | MHCD | -$5 M | -$4 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | -$17 M |
CDIV | +$91 M | +$330 M | +$905 M | +$956 M | +$1,180 M |
MHCD vs CDIV exposure
Countries
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
CDIV
Canada
96.50%
Sectors
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
CDIV
Finance
39.84%
Energy
18.24%
Non-Energy Materials
15.41%
Other
26.51%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
CDIV
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
4.02%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.01%
Bank of Montreal
3.99%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.97%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.96%
Canadian National Railway Co.
3.95%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.83%
Nutrien Ltd.
2.84%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
2.69%
Diversification
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
CDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
38.59%
Characteristics
Compare
MHCD
CDIV
| Provider | Middlefield | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.24% | 1.83% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2017 | November 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about MHCD and CDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MHCD or CDIV?
As of October 29, 2026, MHCD has returned 13.31% year to date, while CDIV has returned 19.21%. CDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MHCD or CDIV?
As of October 29, 2026, MHCD manages $163.28 M in assets, while CDIV manages $2.05 B. CDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MHCD and CDIV managed?
MHCD is actively managed by Middlefield. It does not track an index. CDIV is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MHCD or CDIV?
Year to date, MHCD has seen +$1.88 M in net flows, compared with +$904.80 M for CDIV. CDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MHCD and CDIV compare?
MHCD has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while CDIV has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about MHCD and CDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.