VS
When evaluating costs, MHCD features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.28% for VIDY. Performance-wise, MHCD has returned 11.03% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas VIDY is at 17.08% with +$915 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MHCD
VIDY
| AuM | $160.00 M | $2,270.21 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.25% | 0.32% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MHCD | +1.85% | +4.11% | +11.03% | +14.51% | +44.33% |
VIDY | -1.84% | -1.31% | +17.08% | +21.89% | +95.65% | |
| Flows | MHCD | -$5 M | -$4 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | -$18 M |
VIDY | +$36 M | +$183 M | +$915 M | +$1,123 M | +$1,806 M |
MHCD vs VIDY exposure
Countries
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Japan
16.54%
United Kingdom
15.41%
Switzerland
10.87%
Australia
10.68%
France
7.67%
Other
38.83%
Sectors
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Finance
44.05%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.53%
Non-Energy Materials
7.02%
Other
31.33%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.72%
Roche Holding AG
2.35%
Novartis AG
2.17%
Shell Plc
1.94%
Nestlé SA
1.92%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.92%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.84%
Banco Santander SA
1.66%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.61%
Allianz SE
1.52%
Diversification
MHCD
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 630 total
19.66%
Characteristics
Compare
MHCD
VIDY
| Provider | Middlefield | Vanguard |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.33% | 2.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2017 | August 21, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about MHCD and VIDY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MHCD or VIDY?
As of October 27, 2026, MHCD has returned 11.03% year to date, while VIDY has returned 17.08%. VIDY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MHCD or VIDY?
As of October 27, 2026, MHCD manages $160.00 M in assets, while VIDY manages $2.27 B. VIDY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MHCD and VIDY managed?
MHCD is actively managed by Middlefield. It does not track an index. VIDY is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MHCD or VIDY?
Year to date, MHCD has seen +$1.88 M in net flows, compared with +$914.98 M for VIDY. VIDY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MHCD and VIDY compare?
MHCD has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while VIDY has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
Recent articles about MHCD and VIDY
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.